Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference

[Lasse Rempe]

> How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications 
> that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached.  If this looks 
> o.k. then I'll make the patch.

I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader 
would interpret the text to correspond to the beginning of the second 
bar, whereas logically in the lilypond file it would come _after_ the 
first note. Am I the only one who thinks it is not clean to document 
this as a standard solution?