[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ugly .ps output
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: ugly .ps output |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716) |
If you clarify what you mean by "ugly", it's easier to comment on your
problems.
Do you mean fussy-looking or do you mean that certain symbols are
missing or replaced
by something else? Also, what kind of applications do you use when
viewing/printing the PS file.
The Postscript output by LilyPond is primarily intended as an
intermediate format which then
is converted to PDF format (LilyPond does this internally, by calling
Ghostscript). Certain
constructs in the Postscript output are a bit special and won't work
with all Postscript
interpreters and printers.
/Mats
François Labadens wrote:
I tried to use the .ps output, but it's not so good as the .pdf one. It's the
same thing under Windows XP or Ubuntu 7.10.
Do you have any solutions ?
François
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================