[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: staffsize
From: |
Martin Tarenskeen |
Subject: |
Re: staffsize |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:25:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:16:33AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Strangely enough, the solution is to use the following strategy:
Thank you. There are (many) times that I don't yet completely understand
the logic behind Lilypond. This was one of them. Good to have this
mailinglist :-)
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 13)
> \book{
> % Complete score
> ...
> }
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 20)
> \book{
> % Part 1
> ...
> }
>
> ...
>
>
> /Mats
>
> Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>> Now what I want is to have a smaller staffsize for the complete score,
>> and a normal staffsize for the individual parts for printing.
>>
>> I have tried #(set-global-staff-size 13)
>> and this gives me the result I want for the complete score.
>>
>> Then I tried
>> \layout {
>> #(layout-set-staff-size 13)
>> }
>> within the \book{\score{ .... }} section of the complete score. I
>> expected to get the same result, but it looks ugly.
- staffsize, Martin Tarenskeen, 2009/02/24
- Re: staffsize, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/02/24
- Re: staffsize,
Martin Tarenskeen <=