[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (de)cresendi syntax
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: (de)cresendi syntax |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:37:06 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:37:50PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> > - \cresc, \dim, \decr, \decresc produce a text without spanner, applies
> > only once to the previous note, no need to finish with \! or \endcresc,
> > this could be implemented with a \markup command
>
> I don't like the idea of changing current syntax so dramatically, but I may
> be in the minority here.
It would certainly make the convert-ly rule a pain, or else raise
howls of protest from people at the changing syntax. :)
Also, how would this version of \cresc work with MIDI volume?
Would it just be an instant increase, or spread over a fixed 4
notes, or what?
I admit that MIDI volume is a fairly minor point in lilypond.
> > - remove unnecessary \cr, \endcr, \decr, \enddecr
>
> I'm not sure why we have both \cr and \<. If the two really are equivalent,
> one ought to be deprecated before it is ultimately removed.
I have a vague notion that \cr *was* deprecated.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: (de)cresendi syntax,
Graham Percival <=