|
From: | kztone |
Subject: | Re: Lilypond and Jazz chords |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:52:53 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <address@hidden>, Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden> writesBut there is a (to me) surprisingly large contingent of users who claim that there is no well-defined connection between chord names and chord notes, andthat they want total control over the symbols to be displayed. And thelyricChordNames functionality is a way to get transposable chord names forpeople who are in that camp.Let's take the notes C, Eb, F, Ab. Which chord is that? What's the root?You can easily go from the name to the notes, but not the other way round.
I agree. I think it's easy to convert chord tones(voicing) to chord nameif voicing is a stacking thirds from root w/o rotation, but who use this voicing?
I don't know how to call this but I often use voicing like <F B E> for G7, Db7 or Fmaj7.
Also many players use quartal voicing(stacking forth).i.e. <D G C F>. we can say Dm11 for this but probably there is no Dm11 in the music sheet. People might use this voicing for Dm7. Of course, if you change root, you'll get other chords.
To me, chord name is just guide to generate voicing, or to imply associated scales. Also chord *progression* influences voicing. I don't think there is a perfect way to convert chord tones(voicing) to chord name.
-kz
Cheers, Wol
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |