Re: website draft 4, help wanted

[Tim McNamara]

On Jul 4, 2009, at 3:49 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:

> chip wrote:
> > Generally speaking, when it comes to Windows documentation - it
> > is almost always dummy proof. Showing every step one might come
> > across during the process. It applies to XP as that is what I
> > use, should apply equally to NT and 2000. Never seen ME, does
> > anyone actually use it? Vista has the same steps but a different
> > control panel. I don't have a Vista machine to get the exact
> > steps.
>
> Graham,
> I'm with Chip here. Explicit, unambiguous, fool-proof.

The question is whether these need to be on the Web page or in the  
readme that accompanies the file when the user downloads it.