[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:17:25 -0700 (PDT) |
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> For me, I think the "correct musical semantics" argument overrides the
> "don't expand the namespace" argument.
Pardon my ignorance, but is there a legitimate downside to expanding
the namespace? Does it affect performance speed? Eat up memory? Or is
it just that it makes the program look more "clogged" with commands or
something? I'm thinking of the comparison between LISP and Scheme.
They say the entire Scheme standard is smaller than the index of the
LISP standard, so it's more compact. I guess Scheme users might say "I
don't want a whole bunch of features I'm never going to use". But I
imagine LISP users might say "I wouldn't want to have to keep defining
basic operators that Scheme removed from LISP". Is it a personal thing
or is there a clear advantage to having a smaller namespace?
Thanks.
- Mark
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, (continued)
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/21
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/21
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/21
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/07/22
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Marc Hohl, 2009/07/22
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/22
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/22
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/23
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/07/23
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/23
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Marc Hohl, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Hans Aberg, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Marc Hohl, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Marc Hohl, 2009/07/24
- Re: Best name for function to create cross-style noteheads, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/30