quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software

[Daryna Baikadamova]

There are many WYSIWIG software capable of opening and saving lilypond
files, such as MuseScore, Denemo and Canorus.  However what are the
quality of their Lilypond inputs and outputs?

Also when we talk about "quality", we often mean the accuracy, how
well the features are preserved, and how easy for a *human* to read
and manually maintain the Lilypond output in the future.

Thanks!

Daryna