Re: markup help

[James E. Bailey]

On 14.08.2009, at 19:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:

On 8/14/09 9:54 AM, "James E. Bailey" <address@hidden> wrote:

Though I reorganized them for 2.13. Hopefully you'll find this

version easier to read:

http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/index_54.html

- Mark

Thank you, incidentally, after some trial and error (after I sent the email) I

figured that out. Although I should point out, neither documentation source

says that the glyph names for the numbers don't begin with "scripts".

The list of all glyphs says the numbers are "one", "two", etc.  The fermatas

are "scripts.ufermata", "scripts.dfermata", etc.

Where does this imply that the numbers should be "scripts.one", not "one"?

How could we make the documentation clearer?

Thanks,

Carl

No problems, in the 2.12 documentation, b.6 The Feta font. The first sentence there is:

The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" }, see Formatting text. 

In the one on kainhofer it's section a.6 The Feta font:

The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" }, see Formatting text. 

James E. Bailey