[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals
From: |
Leonardo Herrera |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:05:45 -0400 |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:34 AM, David Bobroff<address@hidden> wrote:
> As a follow-up, have the people with "unwanted accidentals" seen this:
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Accidentals-and-key-signatures#Key-signatures
>
> ...and is it not clear? The last example on that page shouldn't be any less
> clear than the example I gave.
I do have a suggestion: I would add two examples to the section that
shows this clearly.
Warning: key signatures and pitches
Please take a close look at the following examples:
Example a:
c d e f g a b
Example b:
\key cis \major
c d e f g a b
To determine whether to print an accidental, LilyPond examines the
pitches and the key signature. The key signature only affects the
printed accidentals, not the note’s pitch! This is a feature that
often causes confusion to newcomers, so let us explain it in more
detail.
[...]
--
Leonardo Herrera
mailto:address@hidden
http://leus.epublish.cl
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, (continued)
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Rogers, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Arne Peters, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Hans Aberg, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Francisco Vila, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Graham Percival, 2009/08/28
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals,
Leonardo Herrera <=
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Graham Percival, 2009/08/25
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/25
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/08/28
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/08/31