Re: Website "easier editing"

[Bernardo Barros]

One solution would be ask if the new user have experience in this
respect? So it will be redirect to one of two different pages: one for
each case.

On 7 May 2010 12:18, Bernardo Barros <address@hidden> wrote:
> For a user inexperienced new Lilypond user in programming (deal with
> text and editors) I think he/she should make contact as fast as
> possible with something like LilyPondTool. In this respect I think
> this way should be as easy as possible for this type of new user.
> Later he/she can choose a different method, but it's not likely that
> he/she will stick with Lilypond if things become to uncommon in a
> first moment. It's nice because it facilitate some common troubles for
> new-users and it run on all platforms. I'm not saying it's the "best"
> editor, but it's the best one for a first experience with Lilypond, in
> my opinion. I like Emacs, I'm waiting to see more functionalities in
> Emacs/lilypond-mode (maybe someone is doing extensions to
> lilypond-mode right now???), but JEdit/Lilypond is running faster, I
> think.
>
> On 7 May 2010 11:13, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The argument for #2: it doesn't make sense to have algorithmic
>> programming environments like Strasheela and FOMUS in the same
>> list as Denemo, Frescobaldi, and LilyPondTool; having the extra
>> options will only confused newbies; if we keep 4 or 5
>> "highlighted" programs in this list and move the rest somewhere
>> else, it won't be much harder to maintain the list; etc.
>>
>>
>> I'm not particularly looking for votes on this issue -- rather,
>> I'm looking for reasons for (or against) #1 and #2 that we haven't
>> thought of.  It would be great if somebody said "we should do #x
>> because XYZ" and then have us go "of course!  XYZ!  That makes
>> everything totally clear; we all agree due to XYZ."
>>
>