[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replies to the list
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Replies to the list |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 17:20:02 +0100 |
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Tim McNamara <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:12 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>
>> If someone posts to the list
>> and he is not subscribed then replying to all does exactly the right
>> thing. It sends the reply to the list regardless of the Reply-to field
>> and it sends a copy to the OP.
>
> There is no need to send an extra copy to the OP because he or she will get
> a copy from the listserv;
If the OP knows how to read, the OP will have set the option in the
listserv **NOT** to get such extra emails.
If the OP does not know how to read, then the mailing list will be
useless anyway.
> My guess is that
> the list loses hundreds of replies a year to the way the reply-to header is
> set.
BS. I estimate 10-20.
- Graham
Re: Replies to the list, Kaz Kylheku, 2010/09/01