[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up'
From: |
Keith E OHara |
Subject: |
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up' |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:17:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) |
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0700, <address@hidden> wrote:
"K" == Keith E OHara writes:
K> It is less clear if the use of Stem 'direction to place rests, in
K> the notes-plus-rests case, was intentional.
Shouldn't the rests by default be placed where the voice goes in the
column - odds up, evens down - regardless of stem-direction?
When there is a difference between the stem direction and the order of the
voice, {\voiceOne \stemDown ...} then yes, it seems that Lilypond should place
the rests according to the \voiceOne instruction. I do not know if it is
practical to change the behavior, but if you send a short example and desired
behavior as a bug report, it can be fixed if practical the next time somebody
revises that part of the program.
K> and since rest-collision.cc insists on asking your rests what is
K> their Stem direction, and since un-pitched rests in a stemNeutral
K> voice answer based on neutral-direction :
I hadn't noticed this clause about un-pitched rests in stemNeutral
voices. Is their behaviour vs. 'neutral-direction documented anywhere?
I should have explained how I determined this. I found the brief description
of 'neutral-direction in the manual, and discovered the rest by experiment.
(Which is fine with me, because experiment is faster than reading and
understanding English for these detailed points.)
- Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', (continued)
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', Keith E OHara, 2010/11/01
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', Keith E OHara, 2010/11/02
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up',
Keith E OHara <=