[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Padding behaviour
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: Padding behaviour |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:03:53 -0500 |
Hello.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden on behalf of Keith OHara
Sent: Wed 11/10/2010 21:04
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Padding behaviour
Similarly you can force the dynamic to the left, \once\override DynamicText #'X-
offset = #-3 and let Lilypond raise/lower it without regard for the parent
note \once\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = ##f.
There is a similar example in the notation reference manual (section 4.6.2) but
if you try that, please tell us if it does what you need. It seems to me that
extra-offset moves things *after* Lilypond has made all her layout choices, so
it has effect too late to let the staves come close together. (This example
might be out of date, or I might just not get it.)
---
I think this is the example you are referring to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/changing-spacing (3rd
Example)
This is updated from the 2.12 manuals where the 'tweak' did not in fact make
any difference and did indeed place the dynamic *after* the spacing had already
been established. This newer example should all the staff below to be allowed
to engraved closer.
Although I am not sure this is what the user wanted - that is they appeared to
want to set this dynamic to have no padding around it, but I don't know how to
do that or indeed if you can.
James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user