[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Specifying bezier curve for tie across line break collideswithclef s
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Specifying bezier curve for tie across line break collideswithclef symbol |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:49:48 -0000 |
Phil
I've just posted a reply to this. This is not really a
bug, as it is not possible to modify the second part of
a cloned tie in this way. It might form the basis of an
enhancement request though ...
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
To: "Nick Payne" <address@hidden>;
<address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Specifying bezier curve for tie across line break
collideswithclef symbol
Nick,
2 questions: 1. How would you like the tie to behave? 2. Can you
make this simpler, please? See
http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html and tiny examples.
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Payne
To: address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:59 AM
Subject: Re: Specifying bezier curve for tie across line break
collides withclef symbol
On 14/12/10 15:24, Nick Payne wrote:
This piece in several voices (Bach's WTC book 1 prelude 4
transcribed for guitar) has a tie between the F-sharps at the end of
bar 36 and at the beginning of bar 37, but because this tie is
across a line break, Lilypond repeats the sharp symbol (which
otherwise wouldn't happen) and displaces the second part of the tie
downwards on the following line so that it appears to be a tie to
the half note B (nobezier.png).
If I attempt to force the tie to the correct position by
specifying its bezier points, then the start and end point are
correct, but a) the tie does not continue almost to the bar line as
it otherwise would, and b) the continuation of the tie on the 2nd
line passes through the clef symbol (bezier.png). I can fix it by
forcing a line break before bar 36, so that the tie is not broken
across two staves, but this then means that the preceding bar has a
complete line to itself and looks very sparse and rather out of
place. Is there any other solution that anyone can suggest.
Nick
Here's a small example that demonstrates the problem. The lower of
the two ties between bars 2 and 3 appears to go to the wrong note,
and if you uncomment the override for the tie control points to get
it correctly positioned vertically, the continuation of the tie in
bar 3 starts at the left of the clef symbol.
\version "2.13.43"
#(set-global-staff-size 24)
\relative c'' {
\time 6/4
<< {
a'8 g fis e dis e \acciaccatura e d4. c'8 b4 |
c4 r2 s2. |
dis8 b c b a g b2\rest <e gis,>4 |
} \\ {
fis,,,8 e' dis e fis b, c4. g8 a4 |
dis2 r4 s2. |
b2 r4 r2. |
} \\ {
fis4 s2 s2. |
s8 e'' fis e g fis ~ fis4. gis8 a4 ~ |
a4 c,2\rest s2. |
} \\ {
s1. |
c8\rest b a g a c dis4. e,8
% \once \override Tie #'control-points = #'((1 . -2) (2.5
. -2.5) (3.5 . -2.5) (5 . -2))
fis4 ~ |
fis4 s2 fis'8 e dis cis dis b |
} >>
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user