[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:53:54 -0700 |
On 12/22/10 7:19 AM, "Marc Mouries" <address@hidden> wrote:
> As a matter of fact, I would suggest to make it even simpler. Use
> whatever internal notation is easier to implement and provide a list of
> tuning like the languages.
> Something like:
>
> \tuning = "violin"
> or
> \include instrument-tunings
>
> One of those command include a file containing the tunings for guitar,
> violin, mandolin (same as violin), ukulele, bass, ...
>
> \storePredefinedDiagram \dMajor
> #violinTuning
> #"o;o;o;3-3;"
We have done that for fretted instruments. We have lots of different
guitar, bass, banjo, and ukulele tunings defined, along with a mandolin
tuning (see scm/tablature.scm). We haven't defined tunings for violin,
viola, bass, or cello since they aren't fretted instruments, and tablature
was developed for fretted instruments.
I'm not saying we can't do this; I'm just saying we haven't.
I think there are two questions here, both of which are important:
1) How do we add a new tuning?
2) What default tunings do we add?
We should deal appropriately with both.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, (continued)
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Ralf Mattes, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, David Kastrup, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Marc Hohl, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Valentin Villenave, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Marc Mouries, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram,
Carl Sorensen <=