[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slur offset over articulations: Error or Intentional?
From: |
MusFelix |
Subject: |
Re: Slur offset over articulations: Error or Intentional? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:29:53 -0800 (PST) |
Thanks. But that only works when the articulation is on the notehead side,
not when it is on the bar side. See this:
\version "2.13.51"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c'
{
\override Slur #'details #'steeper-slope-factor = #0
\override Slur #'details #'non-horizontal-penalty = #0.0
\clef bass
c4( c c c-.)
<< { c8( c c c) c( c c c-.) }
\\ { g4 g g g}
>>
}
http://old.nabble.com/file/p31020370/lilypondSnippetPicture.png
Is there a thorough explanation of the #'details for slurs that I can read
somewhere?
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:45 PM, MusFelix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Whenever there is an articulation on the first or last note of a slur the
>> other end is offset by the same amount, whether it has an articulation or
>> not. Is this intentional in the algorithm or a problem? And is there a
>> way
>> to fix it generally (obviously a slur can be adjusted manually one at a
>> time...).
>
> There are various penalties that you can adjust by hand. Try adding
>
> \override Slur #'details #'steeper-slope-factor = #0
> \override Slur #'details #'non-horizontal-penalty = #0.0
>
> In this case, the notes go horizontal, so there are penalties that
> stops the slur from having a non horizontal slope.
>
> --
> Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Slur-offset-over-articulations%3A-Error-or-Intentional--tp31017880p31020370.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.