Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

[Brett McCoy]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, James Harkins <address@hidden> wrote:
> At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400,
> Brett McCoy wrote:
>> I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the
>> emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think
>> I prefer using Frescobaldi just because it has more music-related
>> features than emacs...
>
> Oh, right... I forgot, I used the transpose feature in Frescobaldi just 
> today. I would miss that in lilypond-mode. Yeah, that pretty much makes my 
> decision... I like emacs but convenience is convenience.

Frescobaldi 2.0 (currently in development) looks to have some nice
features, notably: no KDE dependencies, more cross-platform support
and better integration/interaction between PDF output and lilypond
code

-- 
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
    -- Jelaleddin Rumi