[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Best Practices for Multiple Part Scores
From: |
Gilles Sadowski |
Subject: |
Re: Best Practices for Multiple Part Scores |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:06:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello.
> I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I've been having a heck
> of a time finding previous threads that go into any depth. I see one
> from 2008 (revived in 2010) that references a part of the Learning
> Manual that seems to have moved from section 5 but doesn't really
> contain all that much information.
>
> I would like to set a large piece with multiple parts, with the option
> of producing single-part scores (e.g. an orchestral piece). I have
> found that very quickly my source files get out of control. What are
> the best practices I should be following to keep everything clean and
> D.R.Y.?
>
> I am specifically looking for advice on the following subjects:
> [...]
Several people have encoded extensive scores; there is a web site collecting
some of those works but I do not recall its address right now.
Personally, I have built my own set of template files, which I change
manually for each new encoding work.
This is certainly not as comprehensive or flexible as some of the
suggestions you'll get here, but I can send you my project files of a small
orchestral score, from which you could already extract an answer to several
of the points you mentioned.
Best regards,
Gilles