[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: High-level users?
From: |
Bernardo Barros |
Subject: |
Re: High-level users? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:08:03 -0700 |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Brent Annable <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a
> typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's
> better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill
> in', something that Lilypond's text-input paradigm doesn't really allow for.
> But once all the information is there, making changes is relatively easy,
> and the printed results are, of course, sublime.
With the development of MuseScore (that is a similar program to
Sibelius with less features at this time) having the lilypond
(redable) file export feature, this could encompass both situations of
having a blank score and the best typestting.
Perhaps lilypons and musecore could develop even closer and closer
from now on, that would just make Sibelius pointless.
BTW, musecore got 2 million downloads already
- High-level users?, Seth Williamson, 2011/09/22
- Re: High-level users?, Urs Liska, 2011/09/23
- Re: High-level users?, Edward Neeman, 2011/09/23
- Re: High-level users?, Peekay Ex, 2011/09/23
- Re: High-level users?, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: High-level users?, Tim Roberts, 2011/09/23