|
From: | Helge Kruse |
Subject: | Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision |
Date: | Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:32:02 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse<address@hidden> wrote:What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the stem up/down?It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results: stemUp/Down only changes the direction of stems, while the direction of ties, slurs, articulations, dots, positioning of rests etc. should be changed, too.
I can't contradict this statement. But sometimes I don't find a way to place the notes without stemUp/Down like in this example:
\version "2.14.2" \context PianoStaff << \context Staff=right \relative c'' { \key g \major \time 3/4 s2.\times 4/6 {r16 b cis d[ cis b]} \times 4/6 {r16 cis d e[ d cis]} d a fis d | % 40
} \context Staff=left \relative c' { \clef bass \key g \major \time 3/4 c4 d e | \change Staff=right g4 a \change Staff=left fis | % 40 } >>The left hand plays the two quavers (g and a). The semiquaver rests belong to the right hand's voice. Therefore I want to quavers shown below the rests. But the notes in the sextuplet should keep the stems down to avoid a high skyline.
I played around with voiceOne/Two but found no solution. Probably you have a one?
Threre was a change in the documentation to underline this difference, but apparently it's not enough. Maybe you could suggest what we should do to make this issue clear for all users?
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint to favor voiceOne/Two/Three. But I did not read thorough 763 pages. Which section are you referring?
Regards, Helge
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |