[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17 |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:11:17 +0100 |
Martin,
On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
No one as far as I know who contributes to the LP project does this
actively.
I'm not that technically savvy on this topic, but I seem to recall
that because of LP's use of Guile 1.8 and not Guile 2.0 that it caused
some headaches (they are not (very/at all) backward compatible) for
another distribution package maintainer.
James
- Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/04/29
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, David Kastrup, 2012/04/29
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17,
James <=
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Francisco Vila, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, James, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Pavel Roskin, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, David Kastrup, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, David Kastrup, 2012/04/30
- Re: Lilypond 2.16 fedora 17, Pavel Roskin, 2012/04/30