lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Right way of specifying engraver name?


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Right way of specifying engraver name?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:18:32 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Francisco Vila" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Right way of specifying engraver name?
>
>
>> 2012/8/29 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
>>>> Ah right. We must improve this documentation bit. Are there more cases
>>>> like this?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Which bit of the documentation?
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems
>>
>> We say just "using the Span_stem_engraver" but the user can be
>> confused when adding/removing other engravers because it is sometimes
>> #Name_engraver and sometimes "Name_engraver".
>
>
> I don't believe that would be the right place to change
> anything. Everything stated there is correct.

We can probably agree that a way of registering a Scheme engraver in a
manner where we don't need to document the difference in using it would
beat improving the documentation.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]