[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Right way of specifying engraver name?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Right way of specifying engraver name? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:18:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Francisco Vila" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Right way of specifying engraver name?
>
>
>> 2012/8/29 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
>>>> Ah right. We must improve this documentation bit. Are there more cases
>>>> like this?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Which bit of the documentation?
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems
>>
>> We say just "using the Span_stem_engraver" but the user can be
>> confused when adding/removing other engravers because it is sometimes
>> #Name_engraver and sometimes "Name_engraver".
>
>
> I don't believe that would be the right place to change
> anything. Everything stated there is correct.
We can probably agree that a way of registering a Scheme engraver in a
manner where we don't need to document the difference in using it would
beat improving the documentation.
--
David Kastrup