[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Invalid input I expected to be valid
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: Invalid input I expected to be valid |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Sep 2012 18:46:47 +0100 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Invalid input I expected to be valid
Again, just _what_ did you expect the \p to be attached to when
expecting this to be valid input? I don't see a really convincing
solution.
From a user perspective, I would have expected it to sit on the last note of
the triplet. Again, as a user, I don't really see anything different
between
\times 2/3 { g'4 g'4 g'4 } \p
and
\times 2/3 { g'4 g'4 g'4 \p }
although from following -devel, I realise the parser (?) would likely take
them as completely different.
It was actually auto-generated from my noteworthy converter, so I've done a
minor code change to write dynamics before triplet conclusions.
--
Phil Holmes