[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Modified laissez vibrer ties
From: |
Daniel Rosen |
Subject: |
RE: Modified laissez vibrer ties |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:55:16 +0000 |
Never mind--I found the solution: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=794
I only just discovered the LSR, so I completely forgot to check there before
bothering everyone here. Oops. :-P
DR
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:46 PM
To: address@hidden; David Kastrup; Daniel Rosen
Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM
> Daniel Rosen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline
>> instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted
>> manually.
>
> I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and
> tweaking to-barline in order to have them stop short. I have not been
> able to make to-barline have any effect, though.
Not very elegant, but this might be a possibility:
\relative c'' {
\override Slur #'to-barline = ##t
a1*3/4( \once \hideNotes a4) a1
}
or, if you prefer,
\relative c'' {
a1*3/4 -\tweak #'to-barline ##t ( \once \hideNotes a4) a1 }
Unlike hairpins, 'to-barline for Slurs seems to extend the slur to the _next_
bar line rather than stopping it short at the previous one.
And the hidden note seems to require a non-zero duration too.
Trevor
Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties, Nick Payne, 2012/10/28