[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release
From: |
Damian leGassick |
Subject: |
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:50:46 +0000 |
>
> I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my
> lilyglyphs LaTeX package.
> While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release that
> is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release.
>
only a few days ago I was thinking 'if only....'
really useful
thanks
Damian
- lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/10
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/12
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Noeck, 2012/11/12
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Noeck, 2012/11/12
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release,
Damian leGassick <=