[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Note duration line (contemporary)
From: |
Oscar Dub |
Subject: |
Re: Note duration line (contemporary) |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:58:22 +0000 |
> It looks like you might be able to use a glissando and override the style to
> be "line", then twiddle the thickness until it looks right?
Using this glissando method mentioned, does anybody know of a specific override
that would force the glissando line to be flat (i.e. ignore the y position of
the right bound and instead use the y position of the left one)?
If that's not simple then I was thinking this might be achievable with a
simple-ish scheme callback, something like:
\override Glissando #'bound-details #'right #'Y = >>>>>> some nice function
which returns the staff position of the note that the gliss is attached to
<<<<<<
A nudge in the right direction would be great!
Thanks,
Oscar
- Note duration line (contemporary), Jethro Van Thuyne, 2012/11/21
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Nick Baskin, 2012/11/21
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary),
Oscar Dub <=
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), David Nalesnik, 2012/11/27
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Jeffrey Trevino, 2012/11/28
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Oscar Dub, 2012/11/28
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Thomas Morley, 2012/11/28
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Jeffrey Trevino, 2012/11/28
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Thomas Morley, 2012/11/28
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Paul Morris, 2012/11/29
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), David Nalesnik, 2012/11/29
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), David Nalesnik, 2012/11/29
- Re: Note duration line (contemporary), Matthew Probst, 2012/11/29