[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User comments on R shorthand
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: User comments on R shorthand |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:47:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> [Snip possibly final comments.]
>
> I've read all the emails on this, and personally agree that R*5 for 5
> FMRs of whatever time sig would be a step forward. Whether this is
> easy or difficult to implement is irrelevant to the way we handle
> enhancement requests.
>
> Kieren - suggest you send an enhancement request to -bugs.
If it is entered into the tracker, I strongly suggest adding a link to
my mail with the LilyPond example for a startling bar count. It might
keep people from wasting unnecessary time due to underestimating the
problem.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, (continued)
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Raleigh Arnold, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/03/21
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Noeck, 2013/03/20
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Olivier Biot, 2013/03/23
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Wilbert Berendsen, 2013/03/24