Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break

[Urs Liska]

Am 26.03.2013 13:12, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Dear LilyPonders,
> > When a tied note with accidental ties across a line boundary the
> > accidental is repeated in the next bar. If there is a further note with
> > the same accidental, the accidental is repeated, which looks very odd,
> > as the accidental has already been printed in that bar.
> Do you mean the accidentals on frist quarter notes in each measure,
> i.e. the second accidental here
>
> \version "2.16.2"
> {
> ees'4 ees'8 ees'4 ees' ees'8 ~
> ees' ees'4 ees' ees' ees'8 ~
> }
>
> ?
> If so, it's printed because music notation rules say so.  Notation
> rules say that if an altered note is tied across barline, the tied
> part after barline "inherits" accidental, but the following notes
> don't (as the accidental was in the previous measure), so new
> accidental is needed.
>
> Or do you refer to the accidental after the line break?
Anyway, I also think there should be only one accidental in the measure 
after the line break (although i don't have a strong opinion on which 
one to emend.
If I put an accidental on the first (i.e. the tied note) then I 
definitely don't need a second one in that measure.
But maybe I'd suggest to remove the the accidental on the tied note (and 
then of course place one before the second note).

Best
Urs
> hth,
> Janek
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user