Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break

[Noeck]

> No, it's a feature.
> Janek

Hi Janek,

I first thought that, too. And I still think, the repeated accidental
after a line break of a tied note is a feature and good notation practice.
But here, I am not sure, because two accidentals in one bar looks a bit
exaggerated to me (I would keep the first in the new line and drop the
second). I have no reference at hand to verify.

But if the current behaviour is really the standard notation, something
like the extraNatural switch would be handy:
  \set extraAccidentalAfterTie = ##f % bad name, just as example

If not, this would be worth a bug report.

Cheers,
Joram