Font problem

[Phil Holmes]

Could you start a new subject rather than replying to the Digest if you want help?

 

Which operating system are you using?

--
Phil Holmes

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kale Good

To: address@hidden

Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:49 PM

Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 125, Issue 97

looking into this font issue more, I see I should have included a pdf; I'm using a different font than my snippet (Adobe Garamond Pro in lieu of Garamond Premier Pro) because the results are much worse. Also, as you may note, ligatures are not working.

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Kale Good <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi All,
I'm having a font issue; I'm trying to use Garamond Premier Pro as my serif font (to match my document font for a method book). It won't print the s character. On testing, z printed incorrectly. I switched the font to Adobe Garamond Pro and had similar issues; some characters wouldn't print correctly. Could someone point me in the direction of a fix for this problem?

% Created on Sat Feb 09 15:10:04 EST 2013
\version "2.16.2"
\include "english.ly"

\header {
    title = "a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z fl Th"
   
}

\score {
    \new TabStaff {
        \relative c' {    
            \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #5
            <a,\6>\bar ":|"
        }
    }
}

\paper  {
  myStaffSize = #20
  #(define fonts
    (make-pango-font-tree "Garamond Premier Pro"
                          "Helvetica Neue LT Standard"
                          "Luxi Mono"
                           (/ myStaffSize 20)))
}

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:57 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:

Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
        address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
        address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."