[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \include problem in Scheme function
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: \include problem in Scheme function |
Date: |
Thu, 09 May 2013 16:12:36 +0200 |
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2013, 09:00 -0500 schrieb David Nalesnik:
> Hi Urs,
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> ######################################################
> BUT: One (hopefully last) issue still drives me crazy:
>
> The above version of compileSegment works but lacks the
> if-condition:
>
> If I wrap the function body in an if condition:
>
> (if (defined? 'isSegment)
> ((let ((book
>
>
>
> You've got one two many left parentheses before your let.
Thanks.
I suspected that, but didn't see the forest for the parens (ehm, trees).
I hadn't figured out which closing bracket to remove accordingly.
Now I think I've got it :-) :-)
Best
Urs
>
>
> -David
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Kastrup, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Kastrup, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Phil Holmes, 2013/05/09