[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cross-staff tie
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Cross-staff tie |
Date: |
Fri, 10 May 2013 14:17:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alberto Simões <address@hidden> writes:
> On 10/05/13 12:40, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 10.05.2013 13:33, schrieb Eluze:
>>> <<
>>> \new Staff=A { c'1( \change Staff=B c')}
>>> \new Staff=B { \clef bass R1 R }
>> What Eluze wants to say is
>> a) you can't do this with a tie but you have to use a slur instead
>
> OK. That was probably the doubt I should had pointed in the beginning.
> Thanks :)
Logically it is a tie, however, and it is LilyPond's job to properly
clad the logic into graphics. Similar cases occur with clef changes
in-staff or with enharmonic ties across explicit keychanges or
modulations. We probably should have something like an explicit end tie
for such cases.
Or even imagine a long tie in a cue voice while the transposition of the
instrument is changing (switch from clarinet to cornetto).
--
David Kastrup