[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal bug in strftime?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Fatal bug in strftime? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 May 2013 13:18:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2013-05-11 11:27, Federico Bruni wrote:
>>
>> 2013/5/11 Peter Toye <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>
>> When I try to use the %e format to get rid of leading zeros in the
>> date, lilypond crashes out.
>>
>> \header {
>> title = "title"
>> composer = "no-one"
>> tagline = \markup {
>> Engraved
>> \simple #(strftime "%e/%m/%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
>> with \with-url #"http://lilypond.org/"
>> \line { LilyPond \simple #(lilypond-version)
>> (http://lilypond.org/) }
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> I cannot reproduce the crash on linux.
>> Some Windows user should check
>>
>
> I can confirm that on Windows 7 32-bit and Lilypond 2.17.13 it crashes!
>
> FATAL: memory error in realloc
> C:/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily.scm
> Exited with return code 3.
Well, strftime is not defined by LilyPond. If anybody is interested in
getting that bug approached, one should test it in GUILE-1.8.8 (from its
command prompt, most likely) and GUILE-2.0.9.
I have my doubts the GUILE team can be interested in releasing anything
past GUILE-1.8.8, but if the bug can be shown to be present in 2.0.9,
chances are that a proper report will result in a fixed version by the
time LilyPond migrates to GUILE-2.0.
--
David Kastrup
- Fatal bug in strftime?, Peter Toye, 2013/05/11
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, Peter Toye, 2013/05/12
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, Phil Holmes, 2013/05/12
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, Peter Toye, 2013/05/13
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/13
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, Peter Toye, 2013/05/22
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/22
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, Peter Toye, 2013/05/27
- Re: Fatal bug in strftime?, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/27