Re: Appoggiatura or no

[David Kastrup]

address@hidden writes:

> David,  
>
> Yes I like your approach much better. I had forgotten about the
> difference between using \times and using multiplication to show a
> tuplet.
>
> --John K
>
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:52 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
>>    address@hidden
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>    https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>    address@hidden
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>    address@hidden
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>   1. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (SoundsFromSound)
>>   2. Re:fermata on dotted notes on the top line (Richard Shann)
>>   3. Re:Appoggiatura or not appoggiatura? (David Rogers)
>>   4. feature request: abs-fontsize available for all text grobs
>>      (Kieren MacMillan)

[...]

Sending from an iPod is _no_ reason for quoting the entire traffic of a
whole day without editing, reducing the repeated material to those
passages you are actually replying to.

It's bad enough if people do that for single postings.  Doing that for
daily digests is definitely too much: once this happens daily (whether
by accident or not), the bandwidth of the list will grow exponentially
while the signal to noise ratio will shrink inversely.

If you can't trust yourself not to reply to mails without proper
editing, don't view the list in digest form.

Thanks

-- 
David Kastrup