[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ
From: |
Marc Hohl |
Subject: |
Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:40:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
Am 27.08.2013 18:07, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:
Ok, thanks! Now I can just write
\mark\jazzTempoMarkup Blues c4. "60"
which looks way neater than
\mark\jazzTempoMarkup #"Blues" c4. #"60"
(the numbers still have to be quoted).
Uh, you could have written that even before. The difference is just
that you can write \mark\jazzTempoMarkup \markup ... now.
I think I tried that and got errors before, but I am not sure now.
But the main question still remains – what causes this ugly space when
I use a dotted note?
Not having the Jazz fonts, I just outcommented all instances of \jazzOn
without resulting spacing problems. That would seem to suggest either
bad metrics for the jazz dot, or some other settings made by \jazzOn
(like proportionalNotationDuration or whatever else).
I just skimmed through the \overrides which LilyJAZZ.ily does, and
most of the stencils overrides are paired like this:
\override Staff.NoteHead #'stencil = #jazz-notehead
\override Staff.NoteHead #'Y-extent = \makeUnpurePureContainer
but not the dots! So I added
\override Staff.Dots #'X-extent = \makeUnpurePureContainer
and voilá: it works!
So cc'ing to Torsten, this may be useful for future versions.
Marc
- tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Marc Hohl, 2013/08/26
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Thomas Morley, 2013/08/26
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Marc Hohl, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Marc Hohl, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, David Kastrup, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, Marc Hohl, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ, David Kastrup, 2013/08/27
- Re: tempo markings and LilyJAZZ,
Marc Hohl <=