[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11 |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:15:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Peter Gentry" <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I was confused by small parts of the manuals (I guess one is for
>>> Windows and one for Unix, but that took a while to sink in)
>
>> No, either spelling of the option will work under either system.
>
> PG: Oh but why is the second more complex? Does it include greater
> scope for specification?
It's easier to remember than a single-letter option once you have too
many of the latter. I think one rather hard UNIX quiz question is to
name the three letters which _aren't_ single letter options of the ls
command.
>> Cheer up
>
> DK: Really.
>
> PG: Yes, why not....:)
It is more gracious to achieve a positive reaction by suitable content
rather than commands.
--
David Kastrup
Fw: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/17
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Peter Gentry, 2013/10/17
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Peter Gentry, 2013/10/17