[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Angled Beams
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: Angled Beams |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:38:30 -0800 |
Gilberto,
Yes! Thank you for the direction/instruction. Now I shall look it up in the
manual and play with the parameters.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Gilberto Agostinho
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 10:32 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Angled Beams
Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote
> The command was inserted. I do not see a change. My error?
On my 2.17.95 it does show a difference. You can also try the command \once
\override Beam #'positions = #'(10 . 12). Check out this file:
R beampositions.ly
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n153765/beampositions.ly>
egards,
Do you see a difference now? And was it what you were looking for?
Regards,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Angled-Beams-tp153746p153765.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11
- Re: Angled Beams, David Nalesnik, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11
- Re: Angled Beams, Nick Payne, 2013/11/11
- Re: Angled Beams, David Kastrup, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- RE: Angled Beams, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11
- Re: Angled Beams, David Nalesnik, 2013/11/11
- RE: Angled Beams, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/11/11