[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what do you use ragged-bottom for?
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: what do you use ragged-bottom for? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 07:45:48 +0100 |
2013/11/19 Keith E OHara <address@hidden>:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:15:54 -0800, Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> And btw, i think that it would be good if we had separate
>> stretchability and compressability properties. For example, when i
>> have a SATB choral piece and vertical spacing is cramped, the
>> distances between staves should be compressed more than the distances
>> between systems (because it's very important that the systems remain
>> visually separate). However, when there is a lot of vertical space,
>> it's the distances between systems that should stretch more than
>> distances between staves (as we don't want to have "airy" systems).
>> So, system-system distances should have high stretchability but low
>> compressability compared to staff-staff distances.
>
>
> LilyPond does have separate stretchability and compressibility. Between
> lines and systems on the page, compressibility is the difference between
> basic-distance and minimum-distance.
Fascinating! I'm using Lilypond for a long time and she still surprises me ;-)
Thanks for explanation.
best,
Janek