[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature? |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:22:51 +0100 (CET) |
> global = \repeat unfold 100 s1
> music = \addAt (4 3/8) \global \once \override
> RehearsalMark.extra-offset #’(-1 . 0)
>
> where (4 3/8) means “in the fourth measure, at the moment of the 3rd
> eighth note”
I suggest that such a command allows for a third, optional parameter,
which makes \addAt relative to the `rehearsalMark' property. For
example,
\addAt (4 3/8 17)
would add something four bars plus 3/8 after the 17th \mark.
No idea whether this can be easily implemented...
Werner
- how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/13
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Mike Solomon, 2014/01/14
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/14
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Alex Loomis, 2014/01/15
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/15
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/01/15
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/16
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/16
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Marc Hohl, 2014/01/16
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/16
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/01/14