lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Ottava


From: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Subject: RE: Ottava
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:18:00 -0800

I this is the norm, should Lilypond be changed to conform?

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Shane Brandes
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:03 PM
To: Noeck
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Ottava

\italic \bold "8" \superscript "a" in regular type with dotted line and uses
loco. also in regular type to indicate a return to normal octavation.
Mechetto, Vienna circa 1870's Just happened to be staring at it.

Shane

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Noeck <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the recommended/default formatting for ottava marks/brackets 
> (8va)? I would like to collect some opinions/examples/references on this.
>
> 1) 8
> 2) 8va
> 3) 8^va (8 + va superscript)
> or others?
>
> In bold or not bold? And with dashed lines or dotted or others?
>
> What does E. Gould say or do you know 19th century scores with ottava 
> brackets?
>
> I am pretty sure that I have seen 8^va bold, but I can't find it. The 
> only occurrence I could find in my scores was:
> Boosey & Hawkes: 8 bold .... (with dotted lines)
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]