Re: Custom accidental style (for cadenza)?

[James Harkins]

On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:21:10 AM HKT, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Here's a variation which incorporates my little discovery :)

This is great! Thanks! I can safely say, it probably would have taken me 
half a year to figure this out on my own...

> In the second example, the ! forces the natural.  I don't see that there's
> any logic in allowing the function to ignore an explicit directive like
> this.  (Though I'm guessing it's there as an artifact from the "this is how
> I'd like it to look" example?)

The ! is there in my second example to illustrate the transposing behavior 
that I didn't want. If I remove it from your test file, then it does just 
what I wanted: the C# displays once per beamed group, and there is no 
unnecessary natural sign for E-nat. in the transposed part.

Thanks again -- I owe you a beer, or some snippets of SuperCollider code, 
or something. (This exchange, incidentally, is one of the reasons why I 
prefer free-as-in-freedom software whenever possible.)

hjh