Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

[Paul Morris]

Uns Liska wrote
> Some of them are good, some of them less so, I think.
> Maybe we could start going through the existing snippets and consider 
> possible tags for each of them. This will make a pool of suggestions 
> where we can filter out from.
> 
> One question I still have is: Should the tags be flat too, i.e. single 
> independent tags, or could there also be a hierarchy (which would then 
> be reflected in the documentation)?
> 
> For example I could imagine tagging a snippet
> markup->headers or
> notation->rhythm->polymetrics

I think non-hierarchical (flat) tags make sense, following the principle of
doing the simplest thing that will do the job, in this case helping people
find the files/snippets they're interested in.  

Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me.

-Paul



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/openlilylib-Discuss-restructuring-tp163922p164079.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.