Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring

[Jan-Peter Voigt]

Hi Urs and all,

I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
according to the path they are stored in.
Should we have a dedicated folder for scheme-modules or shall we store
them for example in "includes"?

Best, Jan-Peter

Am 05.07.2014 14:28, schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am 05.07.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Thanks.
>> I think we will have to reconsider our metadata section and then do the
>> transfer in that "reorganization" branch. I strongly suggest to
>> excusively do that using pull requests, even among the members with push
>> access.
>>
>> One more thing I would suggest to implement is some more standardization
>> for the examples files. These should have formalized headers that are
>> created by pulling in the fields from the definitions file. This should
>> be quite easy to implement: Create one file with the redefinition of
>> \booktitlemarkup and place this somewhere outside the user-accessible
>> files. Then each examples file can simply include this with a relative
>> path and there you go.
>> (-> This implies that our metadata considerations take this into account
>> too)
>>
> 
> I have updated the Wiki page
> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/wiki
> 
> and added a note about the reorganization process in the README.md on
> the restructuring branch.
> 
> Urs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user