[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optical spacing -- no more?
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Optical spacing -- no more? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:29:52 +0200 |
Hi,
2014-07-10 15:15 GMT+02:00 Noeck <address@hidden>:
> So I guess the default spacing is now a bit thighter compared to
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing
Nope - the difference is because you're comparing different examples.
Example in Essay has both quarters and eights, and this is what makes
the spacing wider there ("common shortest duration" becomes an eight
instead of quarter). See for yourself:
relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
{ c'4 e''4 e'4 b'4 }
% versus
{
c'4 e''4 e'4 b'4 |
\stemDown
b'8[ e'' a' e'']
\stemNeutral
e'8[ e'8 e'8 e'8]
}
So, I don't think there were any significant changes to spacing in this regard.
best,
Janek
spac.png
Description: PNG image
- Optical spacing -- no more?, James Harkins, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Urs Liska, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Noeck, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Noeck, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Mark Knoop, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?,
Janek Warchoł <=
Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/10
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, Brian Barker, 2014/07/11
- Message not available
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11
- Re: Optical spacing -- no more?, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/11