---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
guoguocuozuoduo <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM
Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles
To: David Nalesnik <
address@hidden>
>There should be for neo-modern, neo-modern-cautionary, neo-modern-voice, neo-modern-voice-cautionary, but not dodecaphonic-no->repeat.
For the record, I think that all of the styles should suppress the repeated accidental, or none should. It comes down to whether the same pitch separated by a rest should be considered an immediate repetition. I think so. Consider the following:
{ fis'4-. fis'-. }
vs.
{ fis'8 r fis' r }
It doesn't make much sense to me that there should be a difference in behavior between the two in any style which detects immediate repetition.
--David