lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: stem comflict


From: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Subject: RE: stem comflict
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:20:01 -0700

Pierre,

 

Thank you for the two solutions. The first suits my “thinking” better

My assumption (incorrect?) was that in the << \\ >> context the first { } was voice one and therefore stem up, and the second { } was voice two and therefore stem down.

Is this not always the case?

 

Mark

 

From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:15 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: stem comflict

 

Hi Mark,

 

2014-09-26 22:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>:

 

What must I do to get the upper version have the same stem alignment as the lower? 

 

Try :

\version "2.18.0"

\relative c' {
  \time 2/4
  <<
    \stemUp
    {
      \grace b''8( e,4. ) a8 |
      \grace a8( gis4\trill ) gis8 r
    }
    \\
    \stemDown
    {
      d4 c | b2
    }
  >>
}

or :

\version "2.18.0"

\relative c' {
  \time 2/4
  <<
    \voiceOne
    {
      \grace b''8( e,4. ) a8 |
      \grace a8( gis4\trill ) gis8 r
    }
    \\
    \voiceTwo
    {
      d4 c | b2
    }
  >>
}

HTH,
Pierre

 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]