RE: grace note bug?

[Mark Stephen Mrotek]

Jaime,

I am not a programmer, nor an expert on the workings of Lilypond. I speak as
an amateur musician.

"\slashedGrace {a'32 a32}" does not give the expected result. No "slash"
appears. If the command is changed to "\slashedGrace {a'32}" a slashed grace
appears.
A \slashedGrace is an acciaccatura (single note) without the slur.

An ornament (grace, acciaccatura, etc.) is attached to a pitch. In the
second example an ornament is attached to another ornament. I am assuming
Lilypond construes the second \slashedGrace to be the main pitch.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Jaime E Oliver
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 4:02 PM
To: LilyPond Users
Subject: grace note bug?

Hi everyone, 

I am not sure if this is a bug, or just improper use, but, when using a
single grace note expression with two notes such as:
\slashedGrace {a'32 a32}
I get the expected result.

But when I use two subsequent ones such as:
\slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32} I get the wrong score
representation. 

I am assuming it is a bug as the software should be able to parse it. While
it seems unusual for a human to write that, it would not be uncommon in
computer generated material. 

Below is a testing code. 

All the best,

Jaime





\relative c'' {

\time 4/4

% example 1 correct
a4 \slashedGrace {a'32 a32}
d,4  d2

% example 2 bug?
a4 \slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32}
d,4  d2

}

\version "2.18.2"
% notes Pd External version: testing_0.01


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user