|
From: | Gagi Petrovic |
Subject: | Re: polyphony and bendAfter |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:58:04 +0100 |
Hi all,
Could the ignoring of the before mentioned bendAfter be a bug, or does it work as intended?
If it isn't, where can I do bug reports?
And in case it is, where can I propose enhancement requests?
Thanks!
Gagi
Dear LilyPond group,Does anyone know how to correctly implement a bendAfter with polyphony? When i do
<e a,>\bendAfter #1 c cLilyPond simply ignores the bendAfter.
The following example works, but isn't a very efficient/elegant workaround. Besides, it's technically not correct either since the bend should depart from both notes.<<
{
\hideNotes
e2\bendAfter #2
}
\\
{ \unHideNotes
<e a,>2 c c c
}
>>Any clue would be greatly appreciated :)Thanks in advance and all the best,Gagifull code:
\version "2.18.2"
\score {
\new Staff {
\relative c' { \cadenzaOn
<<
{
\hideNotes
e2\bendAfter #2
}
\\
{ \unHideNotes
<e a,>2 c c c
}
>>
<e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c
}
}
}
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |