|
From: | tisimst |
Subject: | Re: GoldenAge Font |
Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:06:05 -0700 (MST) |
I agree that they are quite different, and I am digging the GoldenAge font! A nice balance between "handwritten" and legible, with a good amount of contrast (although the chord symbols seem light).self-immolation.info
David Elaine Alt<a href="" value="+14153414954" target="_blank">415 . 341 .4954 "Confusion is highly underrated"[hidden email]
skype: flaming_hakama
Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GoldenAge-Font-tp171849p172061.htmlTo start a new topic under User, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
NAML
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |